top of page

Sinai Attack: Striking Shift in Terrorist Conduct



For decades, the geo-strategic characteristics of the Sinai Peninsula turned it into a playground for various types of criminal activities, ranging from the illegal smuggling of drugs and weapons to accommodating the most dangerous terrorist organizations. However, the recent terrorist attack in western Sinai marks a noticeable shift in the behavior of the terrorist groups that have been operating from the huge Egyptian peninsula since 2013. In particular, the timing and the location of the recent attack are alarming signs that we may be witnessing the birth of a new trend of armed insurgency in that hot region.


On Saturday, the 7th of May, the Egyptian military spokesperson announced that a group of “takfiri” elements attacked a water-lifting station eastern of the Suez Canal. Sadly, the attack led to the killing of eleven Egyptian military personnel (one officer and ten soldiers) and the injury of five persons, who were working on the spot. The military spokesperson confirmed that the Egyptian army immediately started chasing the takfiri elements and quarantined them in an isolated region in the Sinai Peninsula. The next day, the Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, convened a meeting with the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), where he gave instructions for the military to continue the wide-scale campaign against terrorists in Sinai.


In February 2018, the Egyptian Armed Forces, in coordination with security forces from the police apparatus, launched “Comprehensive Operation Sinai” with the goal of eliminating terrorism from the Egyptian land. About five months before the launch of the extensive counter-terrorism mission that targeted terrorist elements in the Sinai Peninsula and the Delta area of northern Egypt, a handful number of unidentified militants attacked a mosque in Bir Al-Abd town in northern Sinai, killing 305 citizens and injuring 128 others. The horrific occurrence of the Bir Al-Abd attack, in November 2017, instigated the application of a State of Emergency that continued for four years, until the Egyptian President decided to annul, in October 2021, as an indication of the success of the state’s counter-terrorism efforts.


In the public Iftar hosted by President El-Sisi during the last week of Ramadan, on April 26th, the topic of achieving sustainable security and socio-economic development in Sinai was loudly celebrated. For the first time ever, the Egyptian President mentioned specific figures of the troops lost and money spent in the decade-long fight against terrorism in Sinai. “We aim to achieve actual development in Sinai. We managed to stabilize the situation there, but we have paid a heavy price for that to happen… the Egyptian army and the police forces had to sacrifice 3,277 of their men, in addition to 12,280 personnel who got serious injuries that prevented them from returning to service;” El-Sisi declared, after saluting the tribal leaders of Sinai for supporting the Egyptian military throughout this lengthy and deadly battle.


Nevertheless, approximately one week after the Egyptian President’s speech, terrorism remerged its head, but in a new color and shape. The statement of the Egyptian military spokesperson, regarding the recent attack in western Sinai, used the word “takfiri” to describe the perpetrators. Usually, “takfiri” refers to Islamist terrorists, whose ideology labels the secular nation-state as “kafir” (i.e.; blasphemous), and thus justifies the killing of military personnel and non-Muslim civilians.


For almost two days after the attack, none of the known, local, or regional, Islamist terrorist organizations claimed responsibility. Then, at a late hour on Sunday, the 8th of May, the Islamic State terrorists (ISIS / Daesh) announced on their Telegram group (online) that they were the perpetrators. However, they did not give any other details and did not share footage from the operation, as they usually do. This, actually, raises doubt about the credibility of ISIS's claim, making it more likely that ISIS is only trying to make use of an orphan attack that no one wants to adopt to retrieve its lost glory in the eyes of its sponsors.


ISIS has never been really present inside Sinai. The terrorists who label themselves as “ISIS-Sinai” are mostly local self-organized terrorist groups, mostly coming from Egypt and jihadist militants in the Gaza Strip, who agreed, in 2015, to unite in one organization and pledge allegiance to ISIS. However, their activities inside or beyond Sinai have been clearly curtailed, at least since the launch of the Egyptian military’s Comprehensive Operation in 2018, and later on as their ISIS masters, in the Levant region, were defeated at the hands of the Kurds.


Aside from ISIS, it is also unlikely that the perpetrators of the attack are from the Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas, as some observers suggested. On one hand, the Muslim Brotherhood group is currently in a state of utter weakness, due to the scarcity of funding and the multiplication of in-house divisions that undermined the cohesiveness of the group’s structure and hierarchy. In other words, the Muslim Brotherhood does not have the resources or the stamina needed to plan for and carry on such a deadly attack.


Likewise, Hamas is hardly a suspect, although it actually has the means to launch such attacks in Sinai, either directly or indirectly through its affiliated terrorist elements in northern Sinai. Yet, it is not in the interest or benefit of Hamas leaders to further complicate their already bruised relationship with the Egyptian state. Since the recent round of war between Hamas and Israel, in May 2021, Egypt has been heavily involved in Gaza politics, either through intelligence and security coordination or through economic projects, such as the Gaza reconstruction initiative.


Nonetheless, a closer look at the timing and the location of the recent terrorist attack in Sinai may give us a clue on the perpetrators and their purpose, to help with expecting their next steps and prepare for deterring them. This is the first time, since 2013, to see a deadly terrorist attack close to the economically strategic area of the Suez Canal, at a far point in western Sinai. Over the past seven years, the terrorist attacks in Sinai have not extended beyond the geographic limitations of northeastern and east-central territories. In the far northeast of the Sinai Peninsula, close to the Rafah border with the Gaza Strip, almost all terrorist organizations exist. There, they can easily smuggle weapons and food, and receive medical treatment in Gaza when needed. In the recent past, Hamas already hosted some of the Sinai-based terrorists and offered them medical support.


So, what has actually happened, and who are the real perpetrators of this attack? There are two ways to explain that. One hypothesis argues that some of the known terrorist groups in the peninsula moved from their favorite northeastern area to the far western area to launch the attack. However, this argument could be easily proved wrong by a quick look at the map. The Sinai Peninsula is huge. There is an extremely long distance (about 300 km) between the northeastern and the central western areas, not to mention the mountainous terrain separating the two poles. Add to the organic difficulty of terrorist movement from northeast to central west, the fact that this exposes terrorists to be easily haunted by the local tribes or the Egyptian military, which is spread all over the peninsula.


The other way to answer the above question is by assuming that a new terrorist group is slowly but surely emerging in the western of Sinai, close to or within the cities surrounding the Suez Canal. Most likely, this group is somehow coordinating with the existing terrorist organizations in the northeastern area, but they are playing low-profile for the time being. One dimension that may support the validity of this assumption is that this new terrorist group is acting in a manner that is slightly different from the known takfiri (Islamist) terrorists.


For example, they are not looking at the Egyptian troops or non-Muslim citizens as a primary target. Rather, their main targets are facilities of strategic importance to the Egyptian economy. Perhaps, it is not a coincidence that one week before attacking the water-lifting point eastern of the Suez Canal, several unidentified militants blew up a gas pipeline, passing through Bir Al-Abd town, in northern Sinai. Natural Gas and the Suez Canal are the most important sectors that pour stable and sustainable income into the Egyptian economy, which is currently stressed by the global crisis resulting from the Russia-Ukraine war.


If the aforementioned analysis proves to be true, we should be alarmed that this will not be the last attack of this kind. This emerging terrorist group will continue to launch similar attacks on other crucial economic facilities in areas that may not be geographically limited to the Sinai Peninsula. The fact that they could reach a point as far as the eastern of the Suez Canal, tells that they can move deeper towards the internal governorates, especially in the Delta area and along Egypt’s western coast in the Mediterranean.


Therefore, the Egyptian state and Armed Forces need to take this assumption into account and start investigating the size and scope of this emerging trend of insurgency, while continuing their larger counter-terrorism battle.


Also, read on The Levant



Comments


bottom of page